Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Bridged SBI, a novel method that corrects biased low-fidelity (LF) posteriors to enhance high-fidelity (HF) inference in robotic earthwork simulations. By utilizing LF simulations to identify parameter regions and applying a local residual bridge to adjust for discrepancies between LF and HF models, the method effectively mitigates the miscoverage issues typically encountered in sequential multi-fidelity simulation-based inference. Experiments demonstrate that Bridged SBI yields significantly more accurate and reliable HF posteriors compared to traditional HF-only SBI and Naive-MF approaches, particularly when HF simulation resources are constrained.
Bridged SBI transforms biased low-fidelity insights into accurate high-fidelity inferences, overcoming critical miscoverage challenges in simulation-based inference.
Accurate calibration of particle-based simulators is crucial for robotic earthwork simulation, but analytical calibration is challenging due to this task's highly nonlinear particle dynamics and the black-box nature of conventional simulators. Although simulation-based inference (SBI) can estimate posterior distributions over simulation parameters solely from forward simulations, applying SBI directly to high-fidelity (HF) particle simulators is often computationally prohibitive. Low-fidelity (LF) simulators with coarser particles can reduce this cost, but changes in particle size and particle count shift the parameter values needed to reproduce the same observation, producing biased LF posteriors. We propose Bridged SBI, which leverages a biased but informative LF posterior to guide HF inference. This method first uses inexpensive LF simulations to identify a coarse high-density parameter region, and then it learns a local residual bridge to transport LF posterior samples toward HF-consistent regions by correcting the LF--HF discrepancy. We analyze how sequential multi-fidelity SBI (Naive-MF) can suffer from LF-induced posterior miscoverage when it directly relies on the LF posterior without discrepancy correction. We then show that Bridged SBI is designed to alleviate this issue by explicitly modeling the LF--HF discrepancy through residual correction. Experiments on both sim-to-sim particle-parameter calibration and real-to-sim calibration with real soil observation show that Bridged SBI produces more accurate and reliable HF posteriors than HF-only SBI or the Naive-MF baseline, especially under limited HF simulation costs.