Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper develops a comprehensive taxonomy for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, categorizing how off-chain assets are represented on-chain across five key components: governance, asset structure, token properties, distributed ledger technology, and economy. By analyzing twenty major RWA systems, the authors reveal that most implementations utilize hybrid architectures, where blockchain tokens facilitate various functions while legal guarantees remain tied to off-chain mechanisms. The taxonomy not only aids in comparing RWA systems but also highlights critical documentation gaps that could hinder the effectiveness of these financial infrastructures.
Current RWA tokenization often relies on hybrid models that blur the lines between on-chain innovation and off-chain legal frameworks, exposing significant design gaps.
Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization has emerged as a prominent application of blockchain technology, enabling off-chain financial and non-financial assets to be represented through blockchain-based instruments. However, deployed RWA systems remain difficult to compare because legal claims, custody arrangements, token mechanics, verification processes, and on-chain integrations are often described separately. This paper develops a systems-level taxonomy of RWA tokenization to classify how off-chain assets are legally, economically, and technically represented on-chain. Following an iterative taxonomy-development method, we organize twenty-three dimensions into five components: governance, asset structure, token properties, distributed ledger technology, and economy. We apply the taxonomy to twenty major RWA systems selected by market capitalization and compare their design choices across asset classes and implementation models. The classification shows that current RWA tokenization is predominantly implemented through hybrid architectures: blockchain tokens support representation, transfer control, redemption workflows, pricing, and composability, while core legal guarantees remain anchored in off-chain legal wrappers, custodial arrangements, compliance processes, and verification mechanisms. The analysis also reveals recurring documentation gaps concerning voting rights, dispute forums, burn mechanics, supply constraints, and reserve verification. Overall, the taxonomy provides a structured basis for comparing RWA systems, identifying design patterns and limitations, and supporting future research on blockchain-based financial infrastructure.