Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces EGTR-Review, a framework for generating scientifically grounded peer reviews using a multi-agent teacher distillation approach. By addressing the limitations of existing LLM methods, which often yield generic feedback and lack evidence support, EGTR-Review employs a structured process for paper decomposition, evidence retrieval, and review synthesis. Experimental results demonstrate that the student model derived from this framework significantly outperforms existing baselines in terms of review quality, factual grounding, and efficiency, achieving lower token consumption and inference time.
EGTR-Review achieves superior peer review generation by effectively grounding feedback in evidence while slashing inference costs.
Scientific peer review generation has attracted increasing attention for reducing reviewing burdens and providing timely feedback. However, existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods often produce generic comments with insufficient evidence support and weak source traceability, while complex multi-agent systems incur high inference costs. To address these challenges, we propose EGTR-Review, an Evidence-Grounded and Traceable Review Generation framework via Multi-Agent Teacher Distillation. EGTR-Review first constructs a multi-agent teacher that performs structure-aware paper decomposition, key-element extraction, external scholarly evidence retrieval, evidence-state labeling, verification reasoning, and review synthesis. It then distills both intermediate reasoning trajectories and final review comments into a lightweight student model through task-prefix-driven multi-task learning. An evidence-weighted objective further reduces the influence of weak, missing, or non-verifiable supervision. Experiments on public peer-review datasets show that EGTR-Review (Student) outperforms strong prompt-based, fine-tuned, and structured/agentic baselines across automatic metrics, LLM-as-Judge evaluation, and human evaluation, while maintaining strong factual grounding and source traceability with substantially lower token consumption and inference time. Our code, prompts, configurations, and sample data are available on GitHub.