Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the hidden burdens of AI-assisted software engineering, specifically focusing on the necessity of human oversight and the cognitive overload experienced by engineers due to excessive AI-generated suggestions. Through qualitative analysis of practitioner opinions, the authors reveal that engineers are frequently required to validate and rework AI outputs, which can detract from their productivity and creativity. The findings underscore the need for strategies to mitigate these challenges, fostering a more sustainable integration of AI tools in software development workflows.
Engineers face a dual burden of constant oversight and cognitive overload from AI tools, threatening productivity and innovation in software development.
AI is changing how software engineers work, but it often comes with hidden burdens and costs. In this paper, we characterize two such often-overlooked burdens: (1) the constant need for human oversight and inspection of AI-generated artifacts; and (2) the growing cognitive overload on software engineers from receiving large amounts of suggestions from AI tools. The need for human oversight is not optional-engineers must review, validate, and sometimes rework what AI produces. At the same time, the flood of AI suggestions, prompts, and possible solutions can leave developers mentally stretched. By blending evidence from recent opinions from practitioners, we highlight these often-overlooked challenges and open a conversation about how teams can handle them in day-to-day AI-assisted software engineering.