Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts an empirical review of how Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) can embed sustainability into their governance and innovation frameworks, contrasting the ERC-8004 standard governed by a DAO with the Google A2A standard governed by a corporate consortium. Utilizing an LLM-powered comparative pipeline, the authors analyze large-scale governance discourse through automated annotation, neural topic modeling, and multi-layer network analysis to uncover socio-technical power structures. The findings highlight the potential of DAOs to foster more sustainable innovation ecosystems compared to traditional corporate governance models.
DAOs may offer a more effective pathway to embedding sustainability in innovation than traditional corporate structures, as evidenced by a comparative analysis of governance standards.
Recent innovation theories on economics remain largely grounded in assumptions of hierarchical firms and closed organizational boundaries, offering limited insight into how innovation unfolds within decentralized, digitally native organizations. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) represent an emerging form of innovation ecosystem characterized by blockchain-based transparency, open participation, and token-driven governance, in which sustainability can be embedded directly into organizational design. This study compares two standards, ERC-8004 and Google A2A, who address the same agent interoperability question, while the former is governed by DAO and the latter by corporation consortium. They are examined through an LLM-powered comparative pipeline for large-scale governance discourse analysis, integrating automated annotation, neural topic modeling, and multi-layer network analysis to study socio-technical power structures. The study provides evidence-based insights for scholars, policymakers, and designers seeking to align innovation, technological governance, and sustainability in future organizational forms.