Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG framework, which enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by implementing dynamic query decomposition and iterative retrieval to improve performance on complex queries. The evaluation across a DevOps knowledge base and the MuSiQue multi-hop reasoning benchmark reveals that while query decomposition improves scores in structured domains, it negatively impacts ranking precision in multi-hop contexts, highlighting the need for selective application of agentic enhancements. The findings underscore the importance of adaptive orchestration in retrieval systems, suggesting that a one-size-fits-all approach may not yield optimal results across varying query types.
Query decomposition boosts performance in structured domains but can backfire in multi-hop reasoning, revealing the need for tailored retrieval strategies.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in external knowledge, but conventional pipelines rely on static, single-step retrieval that limits performance on complex queries. This paper presents an Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG framework that introduces dynamic query decomposition, iterative retrieval, and a bounded self-reflective evaluation loop. We evaluate the system across two complementary datasets: a domain-specific DevOps knowledge base and the multi-hop reasoning benchmark MuSiQue. Using metrics that include overall score, citation accuracy, mean reciprocal rank, and topic coverage, we find that query decomposition yields consistent gains in the structured domain (overall score $+0.04$, MRR $+0.17$ on DevOps) but degrades ranking precision on the multi-hop benchmark, while the reflection mechanism improves citation accuracy at a substantial latency cost. These contrasting results show that agentic enhancements are not universally beneficial and must be applied selectively according to query and domain characteristics. Our findings argue for adaptive, cost-aware orchestration rather than uniformly aggressive reasoning pipelines.