Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces ZERO-APT, a novel framework for evaluating LLM-driven automated penetration testing agents against intelligent defenses, addressing critical gaps in realism, consistency, and auditability. By integrating a configurable LLM Defender that actively detects attacks and employing architectural mechanisms to enhance causal consistency, ZERO-APT enables a more robust assessment of attack strategies. The framework achieves a 79% attack success rate and a Causal Consistency Score of 0.860, significantly outperforming existing benchmarks while providing structured post-hoc reports for decision traceability.
ZERO-APT reveals that LLM-driven penetration testing can achieve a 79% success rate against intelligent defenses, transforming how we evaluate security agents.
LLM-driven automated penetration testing agents are typically evaluated against static targets that neither detect nor respond to attacks, so their behavior under intelligent defense remains untested. The causal consistency of multi-step attack chains likewise hinges on unstable LLM reasoning, and agent decisions remain opaque to human analysts. These three shortcomings, in realism, consistency, and auditability, are usually patched in isolation. We present ZERO-APT, a turn-based attacker-defender-judge framework that addresses them within a single architecture. For realism, ZERO-APT embeds a configurable LLM Defender that consumes Sysmon telemetry and detects attacks in real time, exposing the attacker to a live opponent rather than a passive target. For consistency, three architectural mechanisms move causal consistency from unstable LLM reasoning into enforced system architecture: separation of planning from execution, multi-dimensional ReAct feedback, and a hard-constraint-filtered action library. For auditability, a dedicated Judge agent adjudicates each round, maintains global state, and emits structured post-hoc CTI reports that make every decision traceable. We evaluate a Windows Server 2022 post-exploitation prototype across five scenarios with three Defender configurations. ZERO-APT reaches 79\% attack success rate (Aurora 22\%, PentestGPT 39\%), a Causal Consistency Score of 0.860 (Aurora 0.930, Claude Code 0.520), and end-to-end decision auditability through structured CTI reports. We release the benchmark to support evaluation of penetration agents under intelligent defense.