Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This literature review identifies and synthesizes the safety challenges posed by silent failures in Physical AI systems, which can issue harmful actions despite appearing confident and semantically aligned. It highlights the disconnect between advancements in model capabilities and safety mechanisms, revealing that no existing framework adequately defines runtime authorization boundaries for these systems. The authors propose a new bounded problem formulation, define silent physical-action failures, and create a taxonomy of runtime guardrail functions to enhance safety in autonomous actions.
Silent failures in Physical AI can lead to catastrophic outcomes, yet existing safety frameworks fail to address the critical gap in runtime authorization.
Physical AI systems increasingly map multimodal observations, language instructions, and learned world representations into physically consequential actions. Robotics foundation models, vision-language-action models, and world-model-based autonomous systems can condition decisions that move vehicles, robots, drones, and industrial machines. This transition exposes a safety problem that is not fully captured by conventional AI content moderation or by classical robot safety alone: a black-box model may issue a physically consequential action while appearing confident, plausible, and semantically aligned. The resulting failure can be silent, arising from sensor drift, occlusion, state-estimation error, distribution shift, hallucinated affordances, or invalid physical assumptions before downstream hardware controllers detect a violation. Across embodied foundation models, world models, robotics simulation, embodied safety benchmarks, safe control, runtime assurance, uncertainty estimation, verification, and guardrail evaluation, model capability and safety mechanisms have advanced along largely separate technical tracks. A recurring gap synthesized here is that no single stream surveyed in this review supplies a complete runtime authorization boundary between black-box Physical AI models and physical execution. The resulting analysis develops a bounded problem formulation, a definition of silent physical-action failure, a taxonomy of runtime guardrail functions, and evaluation requirements for comparing guardrails as Physical AI assurance mechanisms.