Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Reverse Probing, a novel uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework tailored for token-level uncertainty estimation in clinical text summarization using LLMs. The method extracts uncertainty signals from four categories of internal activations by treating existing summaries as probes into the model's internal state, avoiding the need for generating new samples. Experiments on two clinical datasets demonstrate that Reverse Probing significantly outperforms adapted baselines, achieving up to 4x higher AUPRC while reducing inference time and computational costs, and identifying delta energy and neighborhood context as key uncertainty predictors.
LLMs can now pinpoint *exactly* which words in a clinical summary they're unsure about, thanks to a new method that's 4x better and way faster than existing approaches.
As large language models are increasingly deployed for clinical text, ensuring they can reliably signal their own uncertainty becomes critical. Most existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods are designed for open-domain generation and cannot localize uncertainty at the token or span level in long clinical text. We propose Reverse Probing, the first UQ framework specialized for clinical summarization, which estimates token-level uncertainty directly from pre-existing labeled summaries. Rather than sampling new outputs, Reverse Probing treats the text as a probe into the model's internal state, extracting uncertainty signals from four categories of internal activations. We evaluate on two expert-annotated clinical datasets and outperform eight adapted baselines on all metrics, achieving up to 4 times higher AUPRC while reducing inference time and computational costs. Feature analysis reveals that delta energy and neighborhood context are the most consistent predictors across all models. This study offers interpretable insights into how models internally respond to unsupported clinical content.