Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of AI on job satisfaction by examining perceptions of job decency and meaningfulness across IT, service, and healthcare sectors through interviews with 24 employees. The study reveals that the anticipated impact of AI on job satisfaction varies across occupational domains, driven by differing perceptions of decency (e.g., working hours) and meaningfulness (e.g., social image). Specifically, IT and healthcare workers anticipate increased satisfaction with decency aspects but decreased satisfaction with meaningfulness, while service workers foresee the opposite.
AI's impact on job satisfaction isn't uniform: IT and healthcare workers fear AI will diminish their sense of purpose, while service workers anticipate a boost in social standing.
The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in workplaces is transforming how we work. While existing research on human-AI collaboration at work often prioritizes performance, less is known about their experiential outcomes. Through interviews with 24 employees across Information Technology (IT), service-based, and healthcare sectors, this paper examines AI's impact on job satisfaction via perceptions of job decency and meaningfulness, now and in the future. Our results reveal that the anticipated impact of AI on overall job satisfaction varies with the occupational domain, with differing perceptions of its underlying decency and meaningfulness. For instance, IT and healthcare anticipate increased satisfaction with decency aspects like working hours but decreased satisfaction with meaningfulness aspects like social image due to misconceptions about AI handling most of their tasks. Conversely, service workers foresee no improvement in their working hours but a higher social standing due to the perceived status boost associated with working with AI.