Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies specific attention heads within LLMs that contribute to "cultural binding," the process of associating cultural items with the correct identity. By ablating identity-to-item edges within these heads, the authors demonstrate a 9-23% reduction in binding strength across eight models. Furthermore, they show that these heads transfer between instruct and base models, suggesting a pre-training origin, and that targeted intervention via amplification steering can improve cultural differentiation accuracy.
LLMs know more about cultural associations than they let on, with specific attention heads acting as a bottleneck that can be tweaked to improve cultural differentiation accuracy.
LLMs often default to equal treatment across cultural groups, even though context warrants differentiation: this is a lack of difference awareness. Using mechanistic interpretability and a factorial design on the N4 cultural appropriation benchmark from Wang et al. (2025), we identify 2-3 mid-layer attention heads per model that contribute causally to cultural binding across eight models (four architectures, base and instruct). Cultural binding is the process of associating cultural items with the appropriate identity. Knockout of the identity-to-item edges on these heads lowers the binding strength by 9-23%. The identified heads transfer from instruct to base models, suggesting that cultural binding is created at pre-training. An $α$-scaling shows a graded dose-response and moderate amplification steering at generation ($α= 2-3$) increases cultural differentiation accuracy by 1-3 pp while leaving neutral reasoning mostly intact. A knowledge probing task shows that models know 3-5 times more than they act upon it, indicating that the bottleneck lies in routing and not knowledge.