Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces a hard-negative augmentation strategy for entity alignment (EA) benchmarks by mining same-name but distinct entity pairs from knowledge graphs, creating more challenging evaluation datasets. They then propose HELEA, a two-stage framework that combines entity encoder retrieval trained on the augmented data with LLM-based reranking. Experiments demonstrate that HELEA achieves strong performance on the new hard-negative benchmarks while maintaining high accuracy on standard EA datasets, highlighting the importance of robustly handling name collisions.
Current entity alignment benchmarks are too easy; this paper introduces a hard-negative dataset where models that rely on name overlap fail spectacularly, but a new LLM-enhanced method succeeds.
Entity Alignment (EA) is essential for knowledge graph (KG) fusion, but existing benchmarks often allow models to exploit name overlap rather than relational structure. This makes it difficult to evaluate whether models can reject same-name entities that refer to different real-world objects. Our primary contribution is a same-name hard-negative augmentation strategy that simultaneously yields quality-controlled evaluation benchmarks (DW-HN29K, DY-HN27K) and augmented training corpora (DW-Train, DY-Train), by mining same-name but distinct entity pairs from KG name-collision groups. We further introduce HELEA, a two-stage framework integrating (i) entity encoder retrieval trained on hard-negative-augmented training corpora with 1-hop KG context, and (ii) LLM-based reranking without additional training. Experiments show that name-dependent baselines collapse to near-random performance on our hard-negative benchmarks, while HELEA achieves F1 0.967 on DW-HN29K while maintaining Hit@1 0.993 on standard DW-15K.