Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Maat, a ReAct agent designed to assist competition law experts in legal research by orchestrating specialized tools for different research tasks. Maat leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ground cases and findings in official sources, incorporates in-line citations, and uses web search as a fallback. Experiments show that Maat significantly outperforms baseline assistants on case-specific tasks while performing competitively on theoretical questions.
Competition law experts can now leverage Maat, an agent that outperforms existing legal assistants by grounding its analysis in official sources and providing rich in-line citations.
Competition law experts conducting legal research must review extensive volumes of cases, decisions, and judicial reports to identify precedents and assess key elements in competition and merger cases. Although general research assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT and legal assistants such as SaulLM-7B and LegalGPT are increasingly used to assist legal research, they remain inadequate for competition law analysis: they lack specialized domain expertise, provide insufficient official citations, or hallucinate competition law cases. We propose Maat, a ReAct agent that orchestrates tools corresponding to different tasks of the research process. Designed iteratively with competition law experts, Maat grounds cases and findings in official sources using RAG for reliability, provides rich in-line citations, falls back to web search when database coverage is insufficient, and prompts the user for clarification when queries are ambiguous. Maat significantly outperforms all baseline assistants on case-specific tasks and performs within range of the top baseline on theoretical question tasks. The dataset used is available on GitHub.