Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper compares megakernel path tracing (PT) and wavefront path tracing (WPT) on GPUs with hardware ray tracing cores. They find that WPT achieves a ~16% speedup over PT due to improved cache locality, as determined through NVIDIA Nsight Graphics analysis. The study also reveals that neither implementation achieves maximum GPU throughput, indicating that communication, memory latency, and synchronization are the primary bottlenecks.
Wavefront path tracing can outperform megakernel path tracing on modern GPUs by 16%, but memory latency and synchronization are bigger bottlenecks than raw compute.
Over the last decade, advances in GPU hardware have been driven in large part by the demands of real-time graphics, culminating in dedicated hardware ray tracing cores (RT cores). These units accelerate ray scene intersection queries directly in hardware, making physically based ray tracing algorithms increasingly practical for interactive applications. This paper compares and analyzes the performance of two ray-based rendering algorithms: forward path tracing (PT) and wavefront path tracing (WPT). GPU-based PT computes the color of each pixel by having each thread trace a single path to completion, naturally leading to a megakernel approach - while WPT maintains state buffers between specialized kernel invocations to trace path stages simultaneously. We find that WPT affords a ~16% speedup over PT in our implementation. By analyzing traces from NVIDIA Nsight Graphics, we attributed this speedup to WPT's improved cache locality compared to PT. We also find that our implementation does not achieve maximum GPU throughput across any of its units, suggesting that communication and memory latency, as well as synchronization, are the limiting factors. Finally, we address potential algorithmic improvements and future work for real-time path tracing implementation for practical applications.