Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces interaction Supervised Semantic Differential (iSSD), an extension of SSD that models how semantic meaning varies across moderators. They apply iSSD to the UC Berkeley Measuring Hate Speech corpus, testing whether annotator racial identity moderates hate-speech judgments. The results show a significant moderation effect, with the interaction gradient revealing group-linked differences in semantic cues predicting hate-speech ratings.
Racial identity significantly shapes hate speech judgments, revealing subtle but measurable differences in how semantic cues influence perceptions across groups.
We introduce interaction SSD, an extension of Supervised Semantic Differential that models how semantic meaning varies across moderators such as groups, traits, or conditions making this variation testable and interpretable. The method estimates a main semantic gradient, an interaction gradient, and conditional gradients, all interpretable through standard SSD tools. We illustrate it on the UC Berkeley Measuring Hate Speech corpus, testing whether annotator racial identity moderates hate-speech judgments of comments targeting people of color. The interaction model detects a significant moderation effect: the shared gradient contrasts dehumanizing hostility with counter-speech, while the interaction gradient reveals smaller group-linked differences in which semantic cues predict hate-speech ratings. Interaction SSD makes moderated meaning-outcome relationships statistically testable and interpretable.