Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates transfer learning for disease forecasting by training models on a dataset spanning 66 infectious diseases and multiple data streams. They evaluate the impact of incorporating different data streams when forecasting 20 different target disease data streams, finding improvements in 84.9% of cases. However, the study also reveals that dissimilar data can degrade performance, emphasizing the importance of data quality in transfer learning.
Forecasting disease outbreaks gets a boost from transfer learning across 66 diseases, but beware: not all data is created equal, and irrelevant data can actually hurt performance.
Disease forecasting models typically rely on a single data stream, making models brittle when histories are short or noisy. Recent top-performing models have shown that synthesizing multiple reporting systems for the same disease improves performance. Other recent work takes this idea a step further, using transfer learning to train a forecasting model for one disease using data from a different disease. We expand upon each of these approaches greatly, training machine learning models on data that span 66 infectious diseases and several data streams. We investigate the value of incorporating different data streams for forecasting 20 different disease data streams. We find that incorporating other data streams improves forecasting in the vast majority (84.9%) of time series and model structures considered. However, our work highlights that the quality of the added data matters, where adding data extremely different from the target data stream can sometimes degrade forecast performance. A major contribution of this work is in compiling a publicly-available database of data for use by the infectious disease forecasting community.