Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper compares feature-based (SVC, Random Forest, XGBoost) and image-based (ResNet-18, ResNet-34) models for classifying methane plumes detected by the TROPOMI satellite instrument as either real emissions or retrieval artifacts. SHAP analysis is used to explain the decisions of both model families. Results show that image-based models generally outperform feature-based models, particularly under imbalanced data conditions, and that both model types rely on similar spatial patterns, but with image-based models capturing more subtle relationships.
Image-based deep learning models can more accurately identify real methane plumes from satellite data than traditional feature-based methods, even when dealing with the messy reality of imbalanced datasets.
Continuous and global detection of large methane emissions is a crucial step for global warming mitigation. Satellite observations, such as from S5P/TROPOMI, combined with plume detection algorithms, can play a key role in this effort. However, not all TROPOMI plume detections that look like methane emission plumes are the result of actual emissions. A significant part of the plume-like features in the data are retrieval artifacts. Such artifacts could be the result of variations in elevation or albedo gradients, high concentrations of aerosols, coastal lines, water bodies, etc. Previous work approached the problem of plume-artifact classification by means of a Support Vector Machine Classifier (SVC), trained on an extensive set of observation-based scalar features designed by domain experts. However, such an approach limits the information scope received by the algorithm to what is deemed to be important by the experts, breaks the spatial relationship between pixels, and loses information during the process of statistical aggregation. In this study, we compare feature-based (SVC, Random Forest, XGBoost) and image-based (ResNet-18, ResNet-34) models for methane plume-artifact classification under balanced and imbalanced evaluation settings. To interpret the results, we apply SHAP-based explainability to both model families. Our findings provide practical guidance for model selection in operational methane-screening workflows such as the CAMS Methane Hotspot Explorer.