Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for comparing psychological constructs by representing them as directions in a shared word-embedding space. They use Supervised Semantic Differential to estimate construct-specific semantic gradients from text-outcome associations and project them onto theoretically motivated reference axes, such as Valence, Arousal, and Dominance (VAD). The framework successfully recovers interpretable VAD directions from word-level affective norms and demonstrates the expected organization of emotions and personality traits within this space.
Unlock direct comparison of psychological constructs across disparate datasets by mapping them into a shared semantic space.
Psychological constructs are often measured in separate instruments, datasets, and research traditions, which makes direct comparison difficult. This paper proposes a framework for making such constructs semantically commensurate by representing and comparing them as directions in a shared word-embedding space. Using Supervised Semantic Differential, we estimate construct-specific semantic gradients from text-outcome associations and project them onto theoretically motivated reference axes. As an initial test case, we use Valence, Arousal, and Dominance (VAD) as an affective coordinate system. First, we recover interpretable VAD directions from English word-level affective norms. Second, we project semantic gradients for 27 GoEmotions categories into this space and recover the expected organization of emotions, especially along valence and arousal. Third, we apply the same procedure to Big Five personality domains and facets derived from IPIP-NEO-300 item-factor associations. Domain-level placements are broadly coherent, while facet-level results are more exploratory because they rely on sparse questionnaire text. The results suggest that embedding spaces can support construct-level comparison across otherwise incommensurable psychological measurements, provided that semantic placements are assessed for stability and interpretability.