Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how visual formats (photos, infographics, data visualizations) and features (aesthetic appeal, production quality) impact the perceived credibility of social media posts. Through a preregistered experiment with 1200 participants, the study found that photos and infographics, but not data visualizations, are perceived as more credible than text-only posts. Aesthetic appeal enhances credibility, partially mediated by processing fluency, while production quality showed no significant effect.
Data visualizations don't get the same credibility boost as photos and infographics on social media, challenging assumptions about the inherent trustworthiness of visual data.
The rapid proliferation of visual content raises fundamental questions about how different visual formats and features shape perceived credibility. Drawing on processing fluency theory, this research examines how visuals shape credibility judgments. We focus on three popular formats-photos, infographics, and data visualizations-comparing them to text-only posts, and test how two visual features, aesthetic appeal and production quality, influence credibility through processing fluency as a mediating mechanism. Through a preregistered experiment with 1200 US participants, we found that visual posts are generally perceived as more credible than text-only posts but this credibility advantage only applies to photos and infographics, not to data visualizations. Aesthetic appeal increases perceived credibility, partially mediated by processing fluency, while production quality had no significant effect on credibility across formats. These findings differentiate visual formats, advance conceptualizations of visual features, and identify processing fluency as a key mechanism for theorizing credibility across multimodal contexts.