Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the factors influencing the sustained use of Generative AI (GenAI) tools by software developers in Italian SMEs, contrasting it with initial adoption drivers. Using a two-phase mixed-methods approach combining longitudinal surveys/interviews and a cross-sectional survey analyzed with PLS-SEM, the research identified individual-level perceptions like productivity, enjoyment, and ease of use as key predictors of continued GenAI usage. The study found that social and organizational factors, typically important in technology adoption, were insignificant in predicting sustained use of GenAI tools in this context.
Forget top-down mandates: software developers keep using GenAI because it boosts their productivity and they enjoy it, not because of social pressure or organizational support.
Generative AI tools are rapidly transforming software development practice, prompting unprecedented research interest. However, existing studies have predominantly examined initial adoption rather than sustained use. Understanding what drives developers to continue using these tools after initial adoption remains underexplored, particularly in small and medium-sized enterprises where resource constraints shape technology decisions differently than in large organisations. This study investigates factors associated with developers' intentions to continue using GenAI tools, adapting the UTAUT2 framework to post-adoption professional contexts. We employed a two-phase mixed-methods design. Phase 1 comprised a six-month longitudinal pilot study at an Italian software company combining surveys and interviews with 17 developers to explore how perceptions of GenAI evolve as experience accumulates. These insights informed a structural model tested in Phase 2 through a cross-sectional survey of 154 developers across Italian SMEs, analysed using PLS-SEM. The model explained substantial variance in continued use intention (R2 = 0.647), with individual-level perceptions, particularly around productivity, enjoyment, and ease of use, driving sustained adoption, whereas social and organisational factors played no significant role. These findings suggest that, for GenAI tools, post-adoption behaviour differs from initial adoption patterns: in voluntary professional contexts, sustained use is driven primarily by individual-level factors rather than by social and organisational support.