Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides a detailed analysis of problem formulation within the Axiomatic Design framework, emphasizing the critical role of defining independent first-level Functional Requirements (FRs). It clarifies the nature of FRs, arguing for their consistency across designers given identical needs and constraints, and identifies common pitfalls that lead to design failures. The paper draws upon Nam P. Suh's works and offers practical guidance, concluding with a discussion on the potential and limitations of LLMs in assisting with first-level problem formulation.
Flawed problem formulation, often underestimated, is the single biggest reason for design failure, and this paper provides a rigorous guide to avoid it.
Problem formulation translating customer needs and constraints into a minimum set of independent first-level functional requirements, is arguably the most critical step in every design framework, including axiomatic design yet it is frequently misunderstood or underestimated in practice. This paper focuses exclusively on problem formulation in axiomatic design it clarifies what first-level FRs are (and are not), explains why they should not legitimately vary across designers given the same needs and constraints, and highlights intrinsic difficulties and recurring pitfalls that lead to design failure. The discussion is grounded primarily in Nam P.Suh's three books. The Principles of Design, Axiomatic Design Advances and Applications, and Complexity Theory, and it offers practical guidance to help designers formulate well-posed first-level FRs. Finally, the paper briefly revisits problem formulation in the era of large language models and discusses what such tools can (and cannot) contribute at the first level.