Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of GenAI exposure on intra-urban inequality in Beijing by constructing a neighborhood-level GenAI Exposure Index based on task-level assessments from five LLMs applied to 5 million job postings. The study finds that GenAI exposure is concentrated in core districts, exacerbating the intra-urban AI divide and leading to wage stagnation in high-exposure neighborhoods despite continued attraction of high-skilled workers. A difference-in-differences analysis around ChatGPT's release supports a causal link between GenAI exposure and this "high-skill trap" driven by task de-skilling and labor-market crowding.
GenAI is creating a "high-skill trap" in Beijing's core districts, where high-skilled workers face wage stagnation due to task de-skilling and labor-market crowding, challenging the conventional wisdom of skill-biased technological change.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is the first automation wave to reach high-cognitive tasks at scale, yet its effects on intra-urban inequality remain largely unknown. Using 5 million job postings from Beijing (2018--2024), we construct a neighborhood-level GenAI Exposure Index by aggregating task-level assessments from five leading large language models. We examine the spatial, structural and causal mechanisms of this shock. We find that GenAI exposure is highly concentrated in the city's core districts, deepening the intra-urban AI divide. Since 2023, high-exposure neighborhoods have experienced wage stagnation even as they continue to attract high-skilled workers -- a "high-skill trap." This wage penalty is driven by task de-skilling and intensified labor-market crowding. A difference-in-differences design centered on ChatGPT's release supports a causal interpretation. These findings challenge the prevailing theory of skill-biased technological change and provide a basis for inclusive AI governance in global technology hubs.
Tsinghua AI