Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates AI-associated lexical shifts in news writing across 34 languages by comparing GPT-4.1 continuations with human-written text to identify AI-overused lemmas. The study reveals significant cross-lingual semantic convergence, with semantically related concepts like 'emphasize'-type verbs frequently overused by AI across diverse languages. Diachronic analysis shows a notable increase in the prevalence of these AI-overused words in news writing after the release of ChatGPT, suggesting a homogenizing influence of AI on global language use.
AI's linguistic fingerprints aren't confined to English; they're subtly reshaping news writing across 34 languages, pushing them towards a shared, AI-influenced style.
AI-associated lexical shifts have been documented mainly in Scientific English. We extend this work to 34 languages in the WMT News Crawl corpus, refining a split-halves continuation diagnostic that compares GPT-4.1 continuations with matched human gold-standard text. For each language, we derive ranked AI-overused lemmas using log prevalence ratios. We find substantial cross-lingual semantic convergence: semantically related concepts recur across typologically diverse languages, with 'emphasize'-type verbs appearing in 24 of 34 languages. Embedding-based and manual analyses support this pattern. We also examine diachronic uptake in news writing before and after ChatGPT's release. Tracking each language's top 20 AI-overused items, we find prevalence increases in 26 of 34 languages from 2020-2021 to 2023-2024, with a mean change of +15.1%, whilst matched baseline words show no comparable increase (-4.5%). In 10 languages with longer historical coverage, longitudinal analyses show post-2022 increases that exceed the modest shifts observed in earlier periods, though with smaller effect sizes than in Scientific English. We validate our approach extensively, including across seeds, model variants, data sizes, model families, and more. Our findings are consistent with the view that AI-associated lexical preferences extend beyond English and may exert cross-lingual homogenising pressure on global language use.