Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates public attitudes towards military AI across nine countries (n=9000) using a preregistered survey, examining the influence of general AI attitudes, opposition to lethal autonomy, and geopolitical orientations. The study finds that positive general attitudes towards AI and hawkish foreign policy views are strong predictors of support for military AI across various scenarios. Principled opposition to lethal autonomy primarily correlates with disapproval of fully autonomous lethal force, while perceived AI risks surprisingly correlate with increased support.
Public support for military AI hinges more on general AI optimism and hawkish foreign policy views than on specific concerns about lethal autonomy, challenging assumptions about widespread opposition.
AI-enabled military systems are a fixture of modern military conflict. Applications vary from autonomous drones for surveillance and attack to AI-supported target selection. The importance of AI for modern conflict shows also in public disputes between governments and technology companies over the conditions for military access to frontier AI. Both military uses and government attempts at enabling and steering them happen before a backdrop of public opinion, yet we still know little about how people think about military AI. Drawing on a preregistered survey of 9,000 respondents in nine countries, including China, Germany, and the United States, we examine whether support for military AI is shaped primarily by general attitudes toward AI, principled opposition to lethal autonomy, or foreign-policy and geopolitical orientations. Across six military AI scenarios that vary in lethality and human control, respondents who view AI as beneficial are substantially more supportive of military AI. Hawkish respondents are also more supportive. By contrast, principled opposition to lethal autonomy is not broadly associated with the full index but is related to the application of fully autonomous lethal force. Contrary to our expectation, perceived AI risks are positively associated with support. Cross-national differences are moderate and broadly consistent with geopolitical context. Overall, public opinion toward military AI appears conditionally permissive. Publics are not categorically opposed to various military uses of AI. Instead, unease is concentrated around fully autonomous lethal force.