Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes a corpus of public submissions to the U.S. government regarding the Trump Administration's AI Action Plan to understand stakeholder perceptions of AI. Topic modeling and frequency analysis reveal significant differences in concerns across stakeholder groups, with individuals focused on AI's impact on life, while the private sector emphasizes security, policy, and development. The study finds that the AI Action Plan disproportionately reflects the concerns of the private sector, underrepresenting individual perspectives.
The U.S. government's AI policy appears to prioritize the private sector's agenda over the concerns of individual citizens.
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more common in our daily lives, it is important to understand how different stakeholders comprehend and envisage the role that these technologies play in shaping social, political, and economic realities. In this paper, we investigate public perceptions of AI based on a corpus of letters submitted during the public consultation for the Trump Administration's US AI Action Plan. To this aim, we release a corpus cleaning pipeline and perform topic modelling and frequency analysis to explore predominant topics discussed by different subgroups (e.g., academia, individuals, private sector) and those appearing in the AI Action Plan. Our results show that individuals voice strong concerns related to the impact of AI on life, while other stakeholders are more concerned with AI development. Our comparison of topics suggests that the AI Action Plan reflects predominantly the concerns of the private sector on security, policies, and development, with individuals' concerns less represented.