Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of context, moral knowledge, and model scale on detecting Schwartz values in political text using supervised DeBERTa models and zero-shot LLMs. They find that while full-document context improves supervised DeBERTa encoders, it doesn't consistently help zero-shot LLMs, and that retrieved moral knowledge is more consistently beneficial across model families and context conditions. Furthermore, scaling model size doesn't guarantee performance gains, highlighting the need to jointly evaluate context, knowledge, and model family in value-sensitive NLP.
Throw out your assumptions: bigger LLMs and more context don't always improve moral value detection in political text; targeted moral knowledge retrieval might be your secret weapon.
Detecting Schwartz values in political text is difficult because implicit cues often depend on surrounding arguments and fine-grained distinctions between neighboring values. We study when context and explicit moral knowledge help sentence-level value detection. Using the ValuesML/Touch{é} ValueEval format, we compare sentence, window, and full-document inputs; no-RAG and retrieval-augmented settings with a curated moral knowledge base; supervised DeBERTa-v3-base/large encoders; and zero-shot LLMs from 12B to 123B parameters. The results show that more context is not uniformly better: full-document context improves supervised DeBERTa encoders by 3.8--4.8 macro-F1 points over sentence-only input, but does not consistently help zero-shot LLMs. Retrieved moral knowledge is more consistently useful in matched comparisons, improving each tested model family and context condition under early fusion. However, scaling from DeBERTa-v3-base to large and from 12B to larger LLMs does not guarantee gains, and simple early fusion outperforms the tested late-fusion and cross-attention RAG variants for encoders. Per-value analyses show that context and retrieval help most for socially situated or conceptually confusable values. These findings suggest that value-sensitive NLP should evaluate context, knowledge, and model family jointly rather than treating longer inputs or larger models as universal improvements.