Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This position paper argues that the current GenAI research agenda in software development disproportionately emphasizes performance metrics, neglecting the impact on developer well-being. It identifies potential negative consequences of GenAI, including increased cognitive load, new forms of oversight labor, and heightened performance expectations, leading to stress and burnout. The paper advocates for a shift towards a more holistic research framework that incorporates human experience, social context, and sustainable productivity.
The relentless pursuit of GenAI-driven productivity in software development may be inadvertently fueling developer burnout and eroding work-life balance.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping software development, with growing emphasis on accelerating productivity and optimizing performance. However, excessive focus on such dimensions risks overlooking the critical implications for developer well-being. GenAI tools can amplify cognitive load, introduce new forms of oversight labor, and escalate expectations around output and pace, contributing to stress, burnout, and diminished work-life balance. The GenAI movement is also transforming professional norms, altering career entry points, demanding continuous adaptation, and deepening inequalities in access and support. This position paper calls for a reorientation of the GenAI research agenda in software development and proposes a theoretical framework to move beyond narrow performance metrics toward investigations that also center on human experience, social context, and sustainable productivity.