Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the effectiveness of document-as-image representations for scientific document retrieval compared to text-based and multimodal approaches. They introduce ArXivDoc, a new benchmark using LaTeX source to enable structured queries based on specific evidence types within scientific papers. Experiments reveal that document-as-image representations are consistently outperformed by text-based methods, even for figure-based queries, and that interleaved text+image representations offer a superior alternative without specialized training.
Stop treating scientific papers like images: text-based representations beat document-as-image approaches for retrieval, even when the query is an image.
Many recent document embedding models are trained on document-as-image representations, embedding rendered pages as images rather than the underlying source. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks for scientific document retrieval, such as ArXivQA and ViDoRe, treat documents as images of pages, implicitly favoring such representations. In this work, we argue that this paradigm is not well-suited for text-rich multimodal scientific documents, where critical evidence is distributed across structured sources, including text, tables, and figures. To study this setting, we introduce ArXivDoc, a new benchmark constructed from the underlying LaTeX sources of scientific papers. Unlike PDF or image-based representations, LaTeX provides direct access to structured elements (e.g., sections, tables, figures, equations), enabling controlled query construction grounded in specific evidence types. We systematically compare text-only, image-based, and multimodal representations across both single-vector and multi-vector retrieval models. Our results show that: (1) document-as-image representations are consistently suboptimal, especially as document length increases; (2) text-based representations are most effective, even for figure-based queries, by leveraging captions and surrounding context; and (3) interleaved text+image representations outperform document-as-image approaches without requiring specialized training.