Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper revisits the Change VQA benchmark in remote sensing by evaluating the performance of Qwen models under a low-rank adaptation (LoRA) framework. The authors compare Qwen3-VL, which utilizes a structured vision-language pipeline, with Qwen3.5, a native multimodal model, revealing that the latter outperforms the former despite not necessarily being larger. The key finding underscores that tightly integrated multimodal architectures are more effective for semantic change reasoning in remote sensing imagery than traditional structured approaches.
Native multimodal models outperform structured vision-language pipelines in Change VQA, challenging assumptions about the benefits of model size.
Change visual question answering (Change VQA) addresses the problem of answering natural-language questions about semantic changes between bi-temporal remote sensing (RS) images. Although vision-language models (VLMs) have recently been studied for temporal RS image understanding, Change VQA remains underexplored in the context of modern multimodal models. In this letter, we revisit the CDVQA benchmark using recent Qwen models under a unified low-rank adaptation (LoRA) setting. We compare Qwen3-VL, which follows a structured vision-language pipeline with multi-depth visual conditioning and a full-attention decoder, with Qwen3.5, a native multimodal model that combines a single-stage alignment with a hybrid decoder backbone. Experimental results on the official CDVQA test splits show that recent VLMs improve over earlier specialized baselines. They further show that performance does not scale monotonically with model size, and that native multimodal models are more effective than structured vision-language pipelines for this task. These findings indicate that tightly integrated multimodal backbones contribute more to performance than scale or explicit multi-depth visual conditioning for language-driven semantic change reasoning in RS imagery.