Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates computationally efficient alternatives to Fokker-Planck (FP) regularization for diffusion models trained with denoising score matching. They analyze several lightweight regularizers, evaluating their impact on both FP residuals and image generation quality. The key finding is that simpler penalty terms can achieve similar benefits to full FP regularization, significantly reducing computational cost without sacrificing generation quality.
You can get the benefits of Fokker-Planck regularization in diffusion models for image generation without the computational headache.
Recent work has shown that diffusion models trained with the denoising score matching (DSM) objective often violate the Fokker--Planck (FP) equation that governs the evolution of the true data density. Directly penalizing these deviations in the objective function reduces their magnitude but introduces a significant computational overhead. It is also observed that enforcing strict adherence to the FP equation does not necessarily lead to improvements in the quality of the generated samples, as often the best results are obtained with weaker FP regularization. In this paper, we investigate whether simpler penalty terms can provide similar benefits. We empirically analyze several lightweight regularizers, study their effect on FP residuals and generation quality, and show that the benefits of FP regularization are available at substantially lower computational cost. Our code is available at https://github.com/OnnoNiemann/fp_diffusion_analysis.