Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reviews implicit neural representations (INRs) from a signal processing perspective, focusing on their spectral properties and approximation capabilities. It traces the evolution of INR architectures, from basic coordinate-based networks to advanced designs with specialized activations and structured representations like hash grids. The review highlights INR applications in areas like medical imaging and 3D scene representation, while also outlining open challenges related to theoretical stability and generalization.
INRs, often seen as a black box, can be understood through the lens of classical signal processing, revealing their spectral biases and approximation trade-offs.
Implicit neural representations (INRs) mark a fundamental shift in signal modeling, moving from discrete sampled data to continuous functional representations. By parameterizing signals as neural networks, INRs provide a unified framework for representing images, audio, video, 3D geometry, and beyond as continuous functions of their coordinates. This functional viewpoint enables signal operations such as differentiation to be carried out analytically through automatic differentiation rather than through discrete approximations. In this article, we examine the evolution of INRs from a signal processing perspective, emphasizing spectral behavior, sampling theory, and multiscale representation. We trace the progression from standard coordinate based networks, which exhibit a spectral bias toward low frequency components, to more advanced designs that reshape the approximation space through specialized activations, including periodic, localized, and adaptive functions. We also discuss structured representations, such as hierarchical decompositions and hash grid encodings, that improve spatial adaptivity and computational efficiency. We further highlight the utility of INRs across a broad range of applications, including inverse problems in medical and radar imaging, compression, and 3D scene representation. By interpreting INRs as learned signal models whose approximation spaces adapt to the underlying data, this article clarifies the field's core conceptual developments and outlines open challenges in theoretical stability, weight space interpretability, and large scale generalization.