Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reviews the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) generation from natural language descriptions. It analyzes the shift from traditional NLP pipelines to LLM-based architectures using prompt engineering and iterative refinement. The review identifies challenges in semantic correctness, evaluation, and real-world validation, and proposes future research directions like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and standardized evaluation.
LLMs are revolutionizing business process modeling, but current approaches still struggle with semantic accuracy and real-world applicability, highlighting a need for more robust evaluation and contextual integration.
Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have stimulated growing interest in automating or assisting Business Process Modeling tasks using natural language. Several approaches have been proposed to transform textual process descriptions into BPMN and related workflow models. However, the extent to which these approaches effectively support complex process modeling in organizational settings remains unclear. This article presents a literature review of AI-driven methods for transforming natural language into BPMN process models, with a particular focus on the role of LLMs. Following a structured review strategy, relevant studies were identified and analyzed to classify existing approaches, examine how LLMs are integrated into text-to-model pipelines, and investigate the evaluation practices used to assess generated models. The analysis reveals a clear shift from rule-based and traditional NLP pipelines toward LLM-based architectures that rely on prompt engineering, intermediate representations, and iterative refinement mechanisms. While these approaches significantly expand the capabilities of automated process model generation, the literature also exposes persistent challenges related to semantic correctness, evaluation fragmentation, reproducibility, and limited validation in real-world organizational contexts. Based on these findings, this review identifies key research gaps and discusses promising directions for future research, including the integration of contextual knowledge through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), its integration with LLMs, the development of interactive modeling architectures, and the need for more comprehensive and standardized evaluation frameworks.