Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the dominant paradigm of optimizing individual AI system performance in isolation, arguing it neglects the importance of error recovery crucial for real-world interactive systems. It highlights the contrast with human error recovery capabilities and proposes exploring designs for robots to detect and recover from their own errors. The paper uses robotic nuclear gloveboxes as a case study to illustrate the challenges and potential design approaches for error recovery in human-robot interaction.
Human-robot interaction should focus on error recovery, not just peak performance, to achieve robust real-world success.
This position paper looks briefly at the way we attempt to program robotic AI systems. Many AI systems are based on the idea of trying to improve the performance of one individual system to beyond so-called human baselines. However, these systems often look at one shot and one-way decisions, whereas the real world is more continuous and interactive. Humans, however, are often able to recover from and learn from errors - enabling a much higher rate of success. We look at the challenges of building a system that can detect/recover from its own errors, using the example of robotic nuclear gloveboxes as a use case to help illustrate examples. We then go on to talk about simple starting designs.