Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors introduce MosaicMRI, a large-scale, open-source dataset of raw musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI data comprising 2,671 volumes and 80,156 slices with diverse anatomies, contrasts, and orientations. They benchmark VarNet on accelerated reconstruction, demonstrating that models trained on combined anatomies outperform anatomy-specific models in low-data regimes, revealing exploitable cross-anatomical correlations. Furthermore, they analyze cross-anatomy generalization, identifying body part groupings that generalize well and highlighting the impact of training set size, anatomy, and protocol on domain shift performance.
Training MRI reconstruction models on diverse anatomies isn't just good practice, it can actually boost performance in low-data regimes by exploiting cross-anatomical correlations.
Deep learning underpins a wide range of applications in MRI, including reconstruction, artifact removal, and segmentation. However, progress has been driven largely by public datasets focused on brain and knee imaging, shaping how models are trained and evaluated. As a result, careful studies of the reliability of these models across diverse anatomical settings remain limited. In this work, we introduce MosaicMRI, a large and diverse collection of fully sampled raw musculoskeletal (MSK) MR measurements designed for training and evaluating machine-learning-based methods. MosaicMRI is the largest open-source raw MSK MRI dataset to date, comprising 2,671 volumes and 80,156 slices. The dataset offers substantial diversity in volume orientation (e.g., axial, sagittal), imaging contrasts (e.g., PD, T1, T2), anatomies (e.g., spine, knee, hip, ankle, and others), and numbers of acquisition coils. Using VarNet as a baseline for accelerated reconstruction task, we perform a comprehensive set of experiments to study scaling behavior with respect to both model capacity and dataset size. Interestingly, models trained on the combined anatomies significantly outperform anatomy-specific models in low-sample regimes, highlighting the benefits of anatomical diversity and the presence of exploitable cross-anatomical correlations. We further evaluate robustness and cross-anatomy generalization by training models on one anatomy (e.g., spine) and testing them on another (e.g., knee). Notably, we identify groups of body parts (e.g., foot and elbow) that generalize well with each other, and highlight that performance under domain shifts depends on both training set size, anatomy, and protocol-specific factors.