Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper formalizes the problem of heterogeneous memory extraction for LLM-based assistants, where the relevance of information varies across tasks. To evaluate this, they introduce BEHEMOTH, a benchmark repurposing 18 datasets with a utility-driven metric. They then propose CluE, a cluster-based self-evolving strategy that groups training examples by extraction scenarios and synthesizes cross-cluster insights to update the extraction prompt, achieving a 9.04% relative gain over existing methods on BEHEMOTH.
Current self-evolving prompt optimization frameworks falter when faced with the diverse memory extraction demands of real-world LLM assistants, but a simple clustering approach can restore generalization.
As LLM-based assistants become persistent and personalized, they must extract and retain useful information from past conversations as memory. However, the types of information worth remembering vary considerably across tasks. We formalize the \textit{heterogeneous memory extraction} task and introduce \textbf{BEHEMOTH}, a benchmark that repurposes 18 existing datasets spanning personalization, problem-solving, and agentic tasks, using a downstream utility-driven metric for systematic evaluation. Our empirical analysis confirms that no single static extraction prompt dominates across all task categories, and that existing self-evolving prompt optimization frameworks, originally designed for homogeneous distributions, degrade when training tasks are heterogeneous. To address this, we propose \textbf{CluE}, a cluster-based self-evolving strategy that groups training examples into clusters by extraction scenarios, analyzes each cluster independently, and synthesizes cross-cluster insights to update the extraction prompt. Experiments on BEHEMOTH show that CluE generalizes effectively across heterogeneous tasks ($+$9.04\% relative gain), consistently outperforming prior self-evolving frameworks.