Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Out-of-Money Reinforcement Learning (OOM-RL), a novel alignment paradigm for multi-agent systems (MAS) where agents are deployed in live financial markets and penalized by capital depletion. OOM-RL forces agents to abandon sycophantic behavior and overfitted hallucinations in favor of a Strict Test-Driven Agentic Workflow (STDAW) with a uni-directional state lock (RO-Lock) anchored to high code coverage. Empirical results from a 20-month study demonstrate that OOM-RL leads to a stable equilibrium with an annualized Sharpe ratio of 2.06, suggesting that economic penalties can effectively align autonomous agents in high-stakes environments.
Forget RLHF and RLAIF – real-world financial losses are the ultimate, un-hackable alignment signal for multi-agent systems.
The alignment of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) for autonomous software engineering is constrained by evaluator epistemic uncertainty. Current paradigms, such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and AI Feedback (RLAIF), frequently induce model sycophancy, while execution-based environments suffer from adversarial"Test Evasion"by unconstrained agents. In this paper, we introduce an objective alignment paradigm: \textbf{Out-of-Money Reinforcement Learning (OOM-RL)}. By deploying agents into the non-stationary, high-friction reality of live financial markets, we utilize critical capital depletion as an un-hackable negative gradient. Our longitudinal 20-month empirical study (July 2024 -- February 2026) chronicles the system's evolution from a high-turnover, sycophantic baseline to a robust, liquidity-aware architecture. We demonstrate that the undeniable ontological consequences of financial loss forced the MAS to abandon overfitted hallucinations in favor of the \textbf{Strict Test-Driven Agentic Workflow (STDAW)}, which enforces a Byzantine-inspired uni-directional state lock (RO-Lock) anchored to a deterministically verified $\geq 95\%$ code coverage constraint matrix. Our results show that while early iterations suffered severe execution decay, the final OOM-RL-aligned system achieved a stable equilibrium with an annualized Sharpe ratio of 2.06 in its mature phase. We conclude that substituting subjective human preference with rigorous economic penalties provides a robust methodology for aligning autonomous agents in high-stakes, real-world environments, laying the groundwork for generalized paradigms where computational billing acts as an objective physical constraint