Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the impact of LLMs and agentic AI systems on software engineering, arguing that the field must shift from manual code authorship to orchestration, verification, and human-AI collaboration. Through a literature review and industry analysis, the authors identify verification as a key bottleneck and highlight the increasing abundance and disposability of AI-generated code. They propose a framework for transforming curricula, tooling, processes, and governance to emphasize system-level design, semantic validation, and accountable oversight.
Software engineering's future hinges on mastering AI orchestration and output verification, not manual coding, as AI-generated code becomes abundant and disposable.
The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems has created an unprecedented abundance of automatically generated code, challenging the traditional software engineering paradigm centered on manual authorship. This paper examines whether the discipline should be reoriented around orchestration, verification, and human-AI collaboration, and what implications this shift holds for education, tools, processes, and professional practice. Drawing on a structured synthesis of relevant literature and emerging industry perspectives, we analyze four key dimensions: the evolving role of the engineer in agentic workflows, verification as a critical quality bottleneck, observed impacts on productivity and maintainability, and broader implications for the discipline. Our analysis indicates that code is transitioning from a scarce, carefully crafted artifact to an abundant and increasingly disposable commodity. As a result, software engineering must reorganize around three core competencies: effective orchestration of multi-agent systems, rigorous verification of AI-generated outputs, and structured human-AI collaboration. We propose a conceptual framework outlining the transformations required across curricula, development tooling, lifecycle processes, and governance models. Rather than diminishing the role of engineers, this shift elevates their responsibilities toward system-level design, semantic validation, and accountable oversight. The paper concludes by highlighting key research challenges, including verification-first lifecycles, prompt traceability, and the long-term evolution of the engineering workforce.