Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper identifies and mitigates the cognitive illusion of agency and understanding that LLM outputs can induce in users, which can degrade verification behavior and trust calibration. They propose and empirically validate seven output-side rules targeting specific linguistic mechanisms that trigger anthropomorphism. Applying these rules via a system prompt to Claude Sonnet 4 resulted in a >97% reduction in anthropomorphic markers and a 49% reduction in output length, without requiring model modification.
LLMs are tricking you into trusting them too much: seven simple rules can slash anthropomorphic language by 97% and make you less likely to treat them like humans.
Large language models (LLMs) in research and development toolchains produce output that triggers attribution of agency and understanding -- a cognitive illusion that degrades verification behavior and trust calibration. No existing mitigation provides a systematic, deployable constraint set for output register. This paper proposes seven output-side rules, each targeting a documented linguistic mechanism, and validates them empirically. In 780 two-turn conversations (constrained vs. default register, 30 tasks, 13 replicates, 1560 API calls), anthropomorphic markers dropped from 1233 to 33 (>97% reduction, p < 0.001), outputs were 49% shorter by word count, and adapted AnthroScore confirmed the shift toward machine register (-1.94 vs. -0.96, p < 0.001). The rules are implemented as a configuration-file system prompt requiring no model modification; validation uses a single model (Claude Sonnet 4). Output quality under the constrained register was not evaluated. The mechanism is extensible to other domains.