Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces the Strategic Courtroom Framework, a multi-agent simulation where LLM agents with varying traits engage in iterative legal argumentation. They systematically evaluate the framework using DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro across synthetic legal cases and team configurations, finding that heterogeneous teams with complementary traits are more persuasive. They also introduce a reinforcement learning-based Trait Orchestrator that outperforms human-designed trait combinations.
Forget static strategies: this work shows how dynamically adapting LLM agent traits in adversarial legal arguments leads to superior persuasion, even outperforming human-designed teams.
Strategic interaction in adversarial domains such as law, diplomacy, and negotiation is mediated by language, yet most game-theoretic models abstract away the mechanisms of persuasion that operate through discourse. We present the Strategic Courtroom Framework, a multi-agent simulation environment in which prosecution and defense teams composed of trait-conditioned Large Language Model (LLM) agents engage in iterative, round-based legal argumentation. Agents are instantiated using nine interpretable traits organized into four archetypes, enabling systematic control over rhetorical style and strategic orientation. We evaluate the framework across 10 synthetic legal cases and 84 three-trait team configurations, totaling over 7{,}000 simulated trials using DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini~2.5~Pro. Our results show that heterogeneous teams with complementary traits consistently outperform homogeneous configurations, that moderate interaction depth yields more stable verdicts, and that certain traits (notably quantitative and charismatic) contribute disproportionately to persuasive success. We further introduce a reinforcement-learning-based Trait Orchestrator that dynamically generates defense traits conditioned on the case and opposing team, discovering strategies that outperform static, human-designed trait combinations. Together, these findings demonstrate how language can be treated as a first-class strategic action space and provide a foundation for building autonomous agents capable of adaptive persuasion in multi-agent environments.