Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper experimentally evaluates the performance of ML-DSA and SLH-DSA signature schemes in TLS 1.3 certificate hierarchies using OpenSSL 3 and oqsprovider. It finds that placing SLH-DSA in the server leaf certificate drastically increases handshake latency and server-side compute cost compared to confining it to upper trust layers. The study highlights the importance of certificate hierarchy design and cryptographic cost distribution for practical post-quantum TLS migration.
Placing SLH-DSA in the leaf certificate of a TLS 1.3 handshake can explode server-side costs, suggesting careful certificate hierarchy design is crucial for post-quantum migration.
Post-quantum migration in TLS 1.3 should not be understood as a flat substitution problem in which one signature algorithm is replaced by another and deployment cost is inferred directly from primitive-level benchmarks. In certificate-based authentication, the practical effect of a signature family depends on where it appears in the certification hierarchy, how much of that hierarchy is exposed during the handshake, and how cryptographic burden is distributed across client and server roles. This paper presents a local experimental study of TLS 1.3 authentication strategies built on OpenSSL 3 and oqsprovider. Using a reproducible laboratory, it compares ML-DSA and SLH-DSA across multiple certificate placements, hierarchy depths, and key-exchange modes, including classical, hybrid, and pure post-quantum configurations. The clearest discontinuity appears when SLH-DSA is placed in the server leaf certificate. In that configuration, handshake latency and server-side compute cost increase by orders of magnitude, while strategies that confine SLH-DSA to upper trust layers and preserve ML-DSA in the interactive leaf remain within a substantially more plausible operational range. The results further show that transport size alone does not explain the heavy regime: once SLH-DSA reaches the leaf, server-side cryptographic cost becomes dominant. The paper argues that post-quantum TLS migration is best evaluated as a problem of certificate-hierarchy design, chain exposure, and cryptographic cost concentration during live authentication.