Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors created BOS-Lig, a dataset of 66,810 ligands with assigned net charges, derived from 126,985 mononuclear transition metal complexes in the Cambridge Structural Database. They used an iterative charge-balancing workflow, leveraging complex charges, metal oxidation states, and consensus across crystallographic observations to confidently assign charges, even in the absence of direct charge information. The dataset also includes classifications of metal coordinating atoms, hemilability, and functional application areas derived from topic modeling of associated journal abstracts, providing a valuable resource for computational screening and data-driven ligand design.
Forget hand-waving about ligand charges: this dataset provides experimentally-grounded charges for over 66,000 ligands, unlocking new possibilities for computational screening of transition metal complexes.
Understanding ligand properties is essential for computational high-throughput screening of transition metal complexes. However, ligand properties such as net charge and other information such as their application area are often absent or inconsistently recorded in crystallographic datasets. Here, we construct a ligand dataset from 126,985 mononuclear transition metal complexes curated from the Cambridge Structural Database. Using an iterative charge-balancing workflow that combines complex charges, metal oxidation states, and consensus across crystallographic observations, we confidently assign net charges to 66,810 ligands among 94,581 identified unique ligand structures to curate the Boston Open-Shell Ligand (BOS-Lig) dataset. The workflow assigns ligand charges in homoleptic complexes first and then iteratively propagates these assignments across heteroleptic environments, allowing charges to be inferred even when direct charge information is unavailable. We analyze cases where simple heuristics such as the octet rule would have failed and introduce a purity metric to identify when our charge assignments may be incorrect. Each ligand is also classified in terms of its metal coordinating atoms and whether there are multiple variants (i.e., hemilability). We then link complexes to their associated journal abstracts and apply a topic-modeling workflow to link 25,146 ligands with functional application areas spanning reactivity, redox chemistry, biological chemistry, and photophysical chemistry. Together, we provide an experimentally grounded dataset of ligand chemical space that connects charge and functional application as a foundation for computational screening and data-driven ligand design.