Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces P2R, a training-free framework for paper-reviewer matching that moves beyond paper-to-paper similarity by constructing structured profiles of papers and reviewers using LLMs, disentangling them into Topics, Methodologies, and Applications. P2R uses a coarse-to-fine pipeline, combining semantic and aspect-level retrieval with an LLM-based committee evaluation under strict rubrics. Experiments on NeurIPS, SIGIR, and SciRepEval demonstrate that P2R consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, highlighting the value of explicit, structured expertise modeling.
Stop relying on paper similarity for reviewer matching: LLMs can build structured profiles of expertise and dramatically improve reviewer assignment.
As conference submission volumes continue to grow, accurately recommending suitable reviewers has become a challenge. Most existing methods follow a ``Paper-to-Paper''matching paradigm, implicitly representing a reviewer by their publication history. However, effective reviewer matching requires capturing multi-dimensional expertise, and textual similarity to past papers alone is often insufficient. To address this gap, we propose P2R, a training-free framework that shifts from implicit paper-to-paper matching to explicit profile-based matching. P2R uses general-purpose LLMs to construct structured profiles for both submissions and reviewers, disentangling them into Topics, Methodologies, and Applications. Building on these profiles, P2R adopts a coarse-to-fine pipeline to balance efficiency and depth. It first performs hybrid retrieval that combines semantic and aspect-level signals to form a high-recall candidate pool, and then applies an LLM-based committee to evaluate candidates under strict rubrics, integrating both multi-dimensional expert views and a holistic Area Chair perspective. Experiments on NeurIPS, SIGIR, and SciRepEval show that P2R consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Ablation studies further verify the necessity of each component. Overall, P2R highlights the value of explicit, structured expertise modeling and offers practical guidance for applying LLMs to reviewer matching.