Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for evaluating adaptive AI models in medical devices, focusing on disentangling performance changes due to model updates versus evolving data distributions. The framework uses three metrics: learning (model improvement), potential (dataset-driven performance shifts), and retention (knowledge preservation). Experiments with simulated population shifts demonstrate that gradual transitions support stable learning and retention, while rapid shifts highlight plasticity-stability trade-offs.
Uncover hidden failure modes in your adaptive AI-enabled medical device by measuring learning, potential, and retention across sequential modifications.
This work addresses challenges in evaluating adaptive artificial intelligence (AI) models for medical devices, where iterative updates to both models and evaluation datasets complicate performance assessment. We introduce a novel approach with three complementary measurements: learning (model improvement on current data), potential (dataset-driven performance shifts), and retention (knowledge preservation across modification steps), to disentangle performance changes caused by model adaptations versus dynamic environments. Case studies using simulated population shifts demonstrate the approach's utility: gradual transitions enable stable learning and retention, while rapid shifts reveal trade-offs between plasticity and stability. These measurements provide practical insights for regulatory science, enabling rigorous assessment of the safety and effectiveness of adaptive AI systems over sequential modifications.