Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates DSPy, a declarative framework, for automating prompt engineering in LLMs, focusing on prompt synthesis, correction, calibration, and adaptive reasoning control. They introduce a unified DSPy LLM architecture that uses symbolic planning, gradient-free optimization, and automated module rewriting to improve factual grounding and reduce hallucinations. Experiments on reasoning, retrieval-augmented generation, and chain-of-thought tasks show 30-45% improvements in factual accuracy and a 25% reduction in hallucination rates.
Stop hand-crafting prompts: DSPy's declarative approach can boost LLM factual accuracy by up to 45% and cut hallucinations by 25% through automated prompt optimization.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across a wide range of natural language processing tasks; however, their effectiveness is highly dependent on prompt design, structure, and embedded reasoning signals. Conventional prompt engineering methods largely rely on heuristic trial-and-error processes, which limits scalability, reproducibility, and generalization across tasks. DSPy, a declarative framework for optimizing text-processing pipelines, offers an alternative approach by enabling automated, modular, and learnable prompt construction for LLM-based systems.This paper presents a systematic study of DSPy-based declarative learning for prompt optimization, with emphasis on prompt synthesis, correction, calibration, and adaptive reasoning control. We introduce a unified DSPy LLM architecture that combines symbolic planning, gradient free optimization, and automated module rewriting to reduce hallucinations, improve factual grounding, and avoid unnecessary prompt complexity. Experimental evaluations conducted on reasoning tasks, retrieval-augmented generation, and multi-step chain-of-thought benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in output reliability, efficiency, and generalization across models. The results show improvements of up to 30 to 45% in factual accuracy and a reduction of approximately 25% in hallucination rates. Finally, we outline key limitations and discuss future research directions for declarative prompt optimization frameworks.