Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a new Romanian EHR dataset of 12,286 hospitalizations to train explainable ML models for sepsis outcome prediction across three classification tasks. They achieve state-of-the-art performance (AUC=0.983, accuracy=0.93 for deceased vs. recovered) using five ML models and subsets of the 10-50 most frequent lab tests. SHAP analysis reveals key predictors, including eosinopenia, an underutilized marker not currently included in standard sepsis assessments.
An overlooked lab marker, eosinopenia, emerges as a top predictor of sepsis outcome, potentially improving clinical assessments.
We develop and analyze explainable machine learning (ML) models for sepsis outcome prediction using a novel Electronic Health Record (EHR) dataset from 12,286 hospitalizations at a large emergency hospital in Romania. The dataset includes demographics, International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnostics, and 600 types of laboratory tests. This study aims to identify clinically strong predictors while achieving state-of-the-art results across three classification tasks: (1)deceased vs. discharged, (2)deceased vs. recovered, and (3)recovered vs. ameliorated. We trained five ML models to capture complex distributions while preserving clinical interpretability. Experiments explored the trade-off between feature richness and patient coverage, using subsets of the 10--50 most frequent laboratory tests. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy and area under the curve (AUC), and explainability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The highest performance was obtained for the deceased vs. recovered case study (AUC=0.983, accuracy=0.93). SHAP analysis identified several strong predictors such as cardiovascular comorbidities, urea levels, aspartate aminotransferase, platelet count, and eosinophil percentage. Eosinopenia emerged as a top predictor, highlighting its value as an underutilized marker that is not included in current assessment standards, while the high performance suggests the applicability of these models in clinical settings.