Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates the performance of ECG biometrics for patient identification using a 1D Inception-v1 model trained with ArcFace loss on a large internal dataset and tested on external datasets (MIMIC-IV-ECG and HEEDB). The study assesses the impact of domain shift, temporal gaps (up to 5 years), and gallery size on identification accuracy, finding significant performance degradation under these challenging conditions. Post-hoc reranking methods are shown to improve retrieval performance, highlighting the importance of score processing.
ECG biometrics, while viable for large-scale patient identification, suffers significant performance drops across domains and over time, revealing the fragility of learned ECG embeddings.
ECG biometrics has been studied mainly on small cohorts and short inter-session intervals, leaving open how identification behaves under large galleries, external domain shift, and multi-year temporal gaps. We evaluated a 1D Inception-v1 model trained with ArcFace on an internal clinical corpus of 164,440 12-lead ECGs from 53,079 patients and tested it on larger cohorts derived from MIMIC-IV-ECG and HEEDB. The study used a unified closed-set leave-one-out protocol with Rank@K and TAR@FAR metrics, together with scale, temporal-stress, reranking, and confidence analyses. Under general comparability, the system achieved Rank@1 of 0.9506 on ASUGI-DB, 0.8291 on MIMIC-GC, and 0.6884 on HEEDB-GC. In the temporal stress test at constant gallery size, Rank@1 declined from 0.7853 to 0.6433 on MIMIC and from 0.6864 to 0.5560 on HEEDB from 1 to 5 years. Scale analysis on HEEDB showed monotonic degradation as gallery size increased and recovery as more examinations per patient became available. On HEEDB-RR, post-hoc reranking further improved retrieval, with AS-norm reaching Rank@1 = 0.8005 from a 0.7765 baseline. ECG identity information therefore remains measurable under externally validated large-scale closed-set conditions, but its operational quality is strongly affected by domain heterogeneity, longitudinal drift, gallery size, and second-stage score processing.