Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates why foundation models have had limited success in genomics compared to NLP, focusing on the role of entropy in genomic sequences. Through training ensembles of models on text and DNA, analyzing their predictions and embeddings, and examining Fisher information flow, the authors find that high entropy in DNA leads to near-uniform output distributions, model disagreement, and unstable embeddings. They further show that models trained on DNA concentrate Fisher information in embedding layers, suggesting a failure to learn inter-token relationships.
Genomic foundation models struggle not because of architecture or data limitations, but because the high entropy of DNA sequences fundamentally undermines their ability to learn meaningful representations through self-supervision.
Foundation models in genomics have shown mixed success compared to their counterparts in natural language processing. Yet, the reasons for their limited effectiveness remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the role of entropy as a fundamental factor limiting the capacities of such models to learn from their training data and develop foundational capabilities. We train ensembles of models on text and DNA sequences and analyze their predictions, static embeddings, and empirical Fisher information flow. We show that the high entropy of genomic sequences -- from the point of view of unseen token prediction -- leads to near-uniform output distributions, disagreement across models, and unstable static embeddings, even for models that are matched in architecture, training and data. We then demonstrate that models trained on DNA concentrate Fisher information in embedding layers, seemingly failing to exploit inter-token relationships. Our results suggest that self-supervised training from sequences alone may not be applicable to genomic data, calling into question the assumptions underlying current methodologies for training genomic foundation models.