Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks several CNN-based and CNN-Transformer architectures for phoneme classification from MEG signals using the LibriBrain dataset, focusing on robustness to distribution shift. They find that preprocessing choices, particularly instance normalization, significantly impact generalization performance, outperforming architectural complexity. The best in-house CNN model achieves 60.95% F1-macro on the test set, but the MEGConformer demonstrates superior robustness with consistent performance across validation and test sets, attributed to more distributed phoneme-sensitive patterns.
Instance normalization is the unsung hero for robust speech decoding from MEG signals, dwarfing the impact of complex architectures.
This study investigates robust speech-related decoding from non-invasive MEG signals using the LibriBrain phoneme-classification benchmark from the 2025 PNPL competition. We compare residual convolutional neural networks (CNNs), an STFT-based CNN, and a CNN--Transformer hybrid, while also examining the effects of group averaging, label balancing, repeated grouping, normalization strategies, and data augmentation. Across our in-house implementations, preprocessing and data-configuration choices matter more than additional architectural complexity, among which instance normalization emerges as the most influential modification for generalization. The strongest of our own models, a CNN with group averaging, label balancing, repeated grouping, and instance normalization, achieves 60.95% F1-macro on the test split, compared with 39.53% for the plain CNN baseline. However, most of our models, without instance normalization, show substantial validation-to-test degradation, indicating that distribution shift induced by different normalization statistics is a major obstacle to generalization in our experiments. By contrast, MEGConformer maintains 64.09% F1-macro on both validation and test, and saliency-map analysis is qualitatively consistent with this contrast: weaker models exhibit more concentrated or repetitive phoneme-sensitive patterns across splits, whereas MEGConformer appears more distributed. Overall, the results suggest that improving the reliability of non-invasive phoneme decoding will likely require better handling of normalization-related distribution shift while also addressing the challenge of single-trial decoding.