Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides an information-geometric analysis of dependency networks, interpreting pseudo-Gibbs sampling as iterative m-projections onto a full conditional manifold. They introduce the full conditional divergence and derive an upper bound on the location of the stationary distribution, offering a theoretical characterization of the approximation error. The authors then reformulate structure and parameter learning as decomposable optimization problems and prove asymptotic consistency.
Dependency networks finally get a theoretical leg to stand on, with a new information-geometric framework that bounds approximation error and guarantees convergence.
Dependency networks (Heckerman et al., 2000) provide a flexible framework for modeling complex systems with many variables by combining independently learned local conditional distributions through pseudo-Gibbs sampling. Despite their computational advantages over Bayesian and Markov networks, the theoretical foundations of dependency networks remain incomplete, primarily because their model distributions -- defined as stationary distributions of pseudo-Gibbs sampling -- lack closed-form expressions. This paper develops an information-geometric analysis of pseudo-Gibbs sampling, interpreting each sampling step as an m-projection onto a full conditional manifold. Building on this interpretation, we introduce the full conditional divergence and derive an upper bound that characterizes the location of the stationary distribution in the space of probability distributions. We then reformulate both structure and parameter learning as optimization problems that decompose into independent subproblems for each node, and prove that the learned model distribution converges to the true underlying distribution as the number of training samples grows to infinity. Experiments confirm that the proposed upper bound is tight in practice.