Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a modular framework for super-resolving coarse-resolution weather forecasts using learned generative super-resolution as a post-processing step. The super-resolution task is formulated as a stochastic inverse problem and trained with flow matching on reanalysis data, preserving large-scale structure through a residual formulation. Results demonstrate the framework's ability to generate physically consistent small-scale variability and achieve competitive forecast skill at 0.25° resolution, with minimal additional training cost.
Unlock high-resolution weather forecasts without the high-resolution training cost: just super-resolve coarse predictions with a flow-matching generative model.
Machine learning-based weather forecasting models now surpass state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction systems, but training and operating these models at high spatial resolution remains computationally expensive. We present a modular framework that decouples forecasting from spatial resolution by applying learned generative super-resolution as a post-processing step to coarse-resolution forecast trajectories. We formulate super-resolution as a stochastic inverse problem, using a residual formulation to preserve large-scale structure while reconstructing unresolved variability. The model is trained with flow matching exclusively on reanalysis data and is applied to global medium-range forecasts. We evaluate (i) design consistency by re-coarsening super-resolved forecasts and comparing them to the original coarse trajectories, and (ii) high-resolution forecast quality using standard ensemble verification metrics and spectral diagnostics. Results show that super-resolution preserves large-scale structure and variance after re-coarsening, introduces physically consistent small-scale variability, and achieves competitive probabilistic forecast skill at 0.25° resolution relative to an operational ensemble baseline, while requiring only a modest additional training cost compared with end-to-end high-resolution forecasting.